🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam order, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to employ a revised congressional map that is projected to include several five new GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three decision, issued on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to overturn a district court's block that had struck down the new map in November.

Court's Reasoning

The district court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating considerable confusion and disrupting the fine federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in justifying its decision.

That lower court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely classified voters by their race – a act known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the new maps. It had mandated the state to employ the boundaries established after the last decennial survey for the upcoming election.

Strong Dissenting Opinion

In a sharply worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's action. She contended that it disregarded the work of the district court, pointing out that its ruling was crafted by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, This court's stay guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated repeatedly, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Redistricting Fight

The court's action is part of a national contest over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican control. Usually, redistricting takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that could add several additional GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, in response, have responded with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas top lawyer hailed the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that ensures representation aligned with Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he stated.

Conversely, opposition party representatives lamented the decision. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the head of a major Democratic election organization.

Another top Democratic leader stated the court had yet again eroded its legitimacy by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he stated.